ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2026
Interferon as a novel agent for management of macular edema: Where do we stand?
Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory macular edema (IME) is a vision-threatening manifestation of ocular inflammation that arises from diverse causes such as uveitis, postoperative inflammation, and drug-related reactions. Corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of management; however, their prolonged use poses significant limitations, creating a need for effective steroid-sparing alternatives. Interferons (IFNs) are long recognized for their immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects and have recently gained attention as therapeutic options in the treatment of IME. This review consolidates current evidence of IFN therapy delivered through systemic, topical, and periocular routes in various etiologies of IME, including uveitic, pseudophakic, and postinfectious conditions. Analysis of 27 clinical studies demonstrates overall improvement in central macular thickness and visual outcomes with IFN therapy, along with a favorable safety profile. Newer administration routes, such as topical IFN drops, posterior subtenon's and subconjunctival injections, offer targeted therapy, avoiding systemic side effects, though frequent dosing may be required due to limited treatment durability. These emerging approaches expand the therapeutic landscape by providing novel nonsteroidal options for patients intolerant to or refractory to conventional therapy. Although most available studies are limited by small sample sizes and heterogeneity in protocols, the growing evidence supports IFN as a valuable adjunct or alternative in the management of IME. Further well-designed trials are warranted to establish standardized dosing, delivery protocols, and long-term safety profiles for these novel routes of administration of IFN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.