ArticleThe Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology2026
Achalasia: Physician Practices and Knowledge in Türkiye.
Article in The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsAchalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder often underrecognized due to nonspecific symptoms and limited physician awareness. Although diagnostic tools have advanced, delays remain common. Previous studies in Türkiye were mainly singlecenter or review-based, with no nationwide assessment of physician-related factors. This study evaluated physician knowledge, diagnostic practices, high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) access, and factors influencing diagnostic delay, providing the first nationwide achalasia-focused dataset. MATERIALS AND
methodsA web-based survey was conducted among 4216 physicians; 675 responses (16.0%) were analyzed. The 32-item questionnaire included demographics, achalasia knowledge, diagnostic/referral practices, HREM accessibility, and training. Participants included 12.3% primary care physicians, 26.4% secondary-level, 26.2% tertiary training/research, and 35.1% university hospital physicians. Overall, 89.6% practiced internal medicine, 9.8% surgical sciences, and 0.6% basic medical sciences.
resultsMale physicians demonstrated higher knowledge (60.8% vs. 39.2%; P < .001) and diagnostic recognition, whereas females reported more self-perceived deficiencies (P < .001). Gastroenterologists had superior diagnostic accuracy (P < .001), but easy HREM access was limited (9.1%). Physicians in tertiary hospitals showed higher knowledge and diagnostic accuracy (P = .025 and P = .040). Participation in training programs and treatment familiarity did not vary by hospital type (P = .437 and P = .512).
conclusionVariations in physician knowledge and diagnostic practices across specialties, hospital types, and gender may contribute to delayed achalasia recognition. Persistent gaps in practical competence, HREM familiarity, and access to diagnostic resources highlight the need for targeted education and structured interventions. Improving diagnostic infrastructure and HREM access may enable earlier diagnosis and enhance outcomes. Cite this article as: Eroğlu Haktanır A, Çelebi A. Achalasia: Physician practices and knowledge in Türkiye. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2026;37(2):260-269.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.