ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2026
Prevalence of Cerebral Microbleeds and Association With Vascular Risk Factors in a Hispanic and Latino American Cohort.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence and number of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) in a Hispanic and Latino cohort from various self-identified backgrounds and test associations with age, vascular risk factors, APOE (apolipoprotein E), and cognitive function.
methodsThe 3T brain magnetic resonance imaging exams were obtained on SOL-INCA-MRI (Study of Latinos-Investigation of Neurocognitive Aging-MRI) magnetic resonance imaging study participants, a community-based study. CMB number was counted and categorized as: (1) any CMB, (2) lobar only, (3) deep only, (4) mixed, (5) deep+mixed, and (6) lobar+mixed. We examined whether prevalence of CMBs varied by age, sex, education, Hispanic background, cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, Framingham Risk Score), APOE genotype, and cognition.
resultsA total of 2455 participants were included who were 63.0±8.4 years of age, 67.9% women, and 62.2% high school education or higher. CMBs prevalence was 11.7% (8.3% lobar only, 2.0% deep only, 1.4% mixed locations). After adjusting for age, sex, and education, a high Framingham Risk Score was associated with the presence of CMBs of all types, except lobar only. Prevalent stroke/transient ischemic attack was associated with higher likelihood of deep-only CMBs. For participants with cognitive impairment, the adjusted prevalence of mixed CMBs (2.2% versus 1.1%,
conclusionsHigh vascular risk scores, self-reported history of stroke/transient ischemic attack, and cognitive status were associated with a higher likelihood of CMBs, especially in deep regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.