SynthesisActa ophthalmologica2026
Non-physician delivered intravitreal injection service: A systematic review of safety, implementation, training and patient experience.
Synthesis in Acta ophthalmologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The global demand for intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy continues to rise, straining ophthalmic capacity worldwide. Task shifting from physicians to trained non-physician healthcare professionals has emerged as a potential strategy to expand service delivery. This systematic review summarizes current evidence on the safety, implementation, training and patient experiences associated with non-physician-delivered intravitreal injection services. We systematically searched 13 scientific literature databases for studies of anti-VEGF injections performed by non-physicians. Data were extracted on safety outcomes, implementation, training, supervision and patient-reported experience. Results from individual studies were qualitatively reviewed according to these four organizational themes. Sixteen studies comprising 100 150 injections were included, primarily from the United Kingdom and Scandinavia. All injectors completed structured training under an ophthalmologist's supervision. Complication rates were very low, including 0.015%-0.07% for endophthalmitis which were comparable to physician-led benchmarks. Implementation of non-physician-delivered intravitreal injection services increased clinical capacity by 25%-85%, reduced waiting times and costs, and maintained safety and efficiency. Patients reported high satisfaction, confidence and acceptance of non-physician-delivered injections. Non-physician-delivered intravitreal injection services are safe, feasible and well accepted when supported by structured training and robust governance frameworks. This task-shifting model offers a scalable solution to meet growing global demand for anti-VEGF therapy. Standardized international training and certification frameworks may further enhance safety and sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.