SynthesisPloS one2026
Patient satisfaction with advanced practice physiotherapy internationally: A systematic mixed studies review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdvanced practice physiotherapy (APP) is internationally recognised as a higher level of practice involving expert clinical and analytical skills to manage complex patient needs. Patient satisfaction measures how pleased someone is with their care, comprises human and system attributes, and is an indicator of patient experience (quality). Patient satisfaction with APP appears high, but no comprehensive evidence synthesis across settings exists. Objectives were to evaluate patient satisfaction with APP internationally, and evaluate human and system attributes of patient satisfaction with APP. MATERIALS AND
methodsSystematic mixed studies review using a parallel-results convergent synthesis design. Key databases and grey literature were searched for studies measuring patient satisfaction with APP across clinical fields from inception to September 9th, 2025. Screening, data-extraction, and quality appraisal were completed in parallel by two reviewers. Narrative (quantitative) and thematic (qualitative) syntheses were integrated through discussion, and GRADE/GRADE-CERQual assessed evidence confidence and certainty.
results35 high (n=8), moderate (n=16), and low (n=11) quality studies were included. Narrative synthesis found very low certainty evidence for high overall and human attributes of patient satisfaction, and mostly high system attributes of patient satisfaction. Thematic synthesis found moderate-high confidence evidence of human attributes of patient satisfaction (proficient communication and interpersonal skills, credible and competent experts, patient empowerment and self-management, thorough assessments) and moderate confidence evidence of system attributes of patient satisfaction (fast access to specialist care, convenient location and amenities, integrated care).
conclusionHuman and system attributes drive high patient satisfaction with APP. High-confidence evidence suggests that AP physiotherapists themselves are integral to patient satisfaction, as found across research in other professions. Quantitative evidence certainty is very-low, therefore future high-quality research is needed to guide APP service development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.