ArticleEBioMedicine2026
Phenotypic age acceleration and early-onset lung cancer: a case-control and prognostic cohort study involving multiple clinical centres with validation in the UK Biobank.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The mediating role of biological age acceleration in the associations between lifestyle factors and incident digestive system cancers: A Prospective Cohort Study from the UK Biobank.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer is mainly diagnosed in elderly adults, yet the incidence of early-onset disease in people aged ≤45 years is increasing. Current screening strategies largely target elder populations, leaving younger individuals at risk of delayed diagnosis and adverse outcomes. Phenotypic Age Acceleration (PhenoAgeAccel), which indicates the difference between biological age and chronological age, has been associated with cancer susceptibility, but its role in early-onset lung cancer is unclear.
methodsWe performed a case-control and prognostic cohort study in China, including 222 early-onset lung cancer patients and 222 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers, and externally validated findings in the UK Biobank. PhenoAgeAccel was calculated from routinely available haematological and biochemical markers. Logistic regression models estimated associations between PhenoAgeAccel and lung cancer risk. Survival analyses assessed the relationship between PhenoAgeAccel and overall survival among early-onset patients.
findingsEarly-onset lung cancer patients had substantially higher PhenoAgeAccel than matched controls (P < 0.001). PhenoAgeAccel was associated with a dose-dependent increase in early-onset lung cancer risk (odds ratio [OR] = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.14-1.23). Subgroup analyses by chronological age demonstrated a stronger association in earlier adulthood, whereas associations among elder adults (≥65 years) were not significant. In early-onset patients, higher PhenoAgeAccel predicted worse overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.20-3.93). Results were corroborated in the UK Biobank cohort.
interpretationPhenoAgeAccel is positively associated with both a greater risk of early-onset lung cancer and poorer prognosis, supporting its potential utility for early detection and risk stratification in younger populations.
fundingNational Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 82303969); Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research Foundation (no. Y-2024AZ [EGFR]MS-0079); Beijing Natural Science Foundation (no. 7222144).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.