ReviewNeuropsychopharmacology reports2026
Evaluating and Determining the Effects of Psychotropic Drugs on Motor Vehicle Driving Performance: Key Considerations of the Japanese Guideline and Criteria for Clinical Implementation of Evidence.
Review in Neuropsychopharmacology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cross-national differences in automobile driving precautions stated in psychotropic drug package inserts primarily reflect regulatory policies and insufficient evaluation method standardization until recent years, rather than intrinsic ethnic differences. In January 2025, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) of Japan issued the Criteria for Determining the Effects of Psychotropic Drugs on Motor Vehicle Driving Performance. These criteria were published as an appendix to an earlier guideline for evaluating these effects published in December 2022. These guidelines and criteria, developed by the authors, provide methods for evaluating the effects of psychotropic drugs. However, these are not intended to assess the fitness of an individual patient to drive. The MHLW guideline and criteria recommend a tiered approach for assessing clinically meaningful driving impairment. Adverse events affecting alertness, such as drowsiness, caused by psychotropic drugs on driving performance are more frequent during the initial treatment stages and dose escalation. Therefore, evaluating the effects of psychotropic drugs on driving performance requires careful consideration of the persistence of clinically meaningful impairment. Additionally, understanding the magnitude and duration of such effects is crucial for selecting appropriate treatments and offering effective guidance to patients. The MHLW criteria categorize the effects of psychotropic drugs on driving performance into four levels based on their magnitude and duration. Furthermore, the MHLW criteria could help to determine which clinical trials are necessary to evaluate the persistence of clinically meaningful impairment. Namely, the MHLW criteria could be used to structure the substantial evidence needed for evaluating the effects on driving performance for approval applications and clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.