Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41672882›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychopharmacology reports2026

Evaluating and Determining the Effects of Psychotropic Drugs on Motor Vehicle Driving Performance: Key Considerations of the Japanese Guideline and Criteria for Clinical Implementation of Evidence.

Tetsuo Nakabayashi, Kunihiro Iwamoto, Akiko Yamaguchi, Yuki Konishi, Momoe Saji, Reiji Yoshimura, Kousuke Kanemoto, Hirofumi Aoki, Masahiko Ando, Norio Ozaki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychopharmacology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tetsuo NakabayashiPharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4491-4851
Kunihiro IwamotoDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3868-3372
Akiko YamaguchiDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8729-8750
Yuki KonishiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6785-5095
Momoe SajiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0704-1054
Reiji YoshimuraDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7637-5576
Kousuke KanemotoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6611-5244
Hirofumi AokiInstitute of Innovation for Future Society, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4930-0181
Masahiko AndoDepartment of Advanced Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5702-9755
Norio OzakiPathophysiology of Mental Disorders, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7360-4898

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 22mk0101227h0001Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 23mk0101227h0002Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 24mk0101227h0003Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP22dk0307113Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP23ak0101215Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K07518Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25K10859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cross-national differences in automobile driving precautions stated in psychotropic drug package inserts primarily reflect regulatory policies and insufficient evaluation method standardization until recent years, rather than intrinsic ethnic differences. In January 2025, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) of Japan issued the Criteria for Determining the Effects of Psychotropic Drugs on Motor Vehicle Driving Performance. These criteria were published as an appendix to an earlier guideline for evaluating these effects published in December 2022. These guidelines and criteria, developed by the authors, provide methods for evaluating the effects of psychotropic drugs. However, these are not intended to assess the fitness of an individual patient to drive. The MHLW guideline and criteria recommend a tiered approach for assessing clinically meaningful driving impairment. Adverse events affecting alertness, such as drowsiness, caused by psychotropic drugs on driving performance are more frequent during the initial treatment stages and dose escalation. Therefore, evaluating the effects of psychotropic drugs on driving performance requires careful consideration of the persistence of clinically meaningful impairment. Additionally, understanding the magnitude and duration of such effects is crucial for selecting appropriate treatments and offering effective guidance to patients. The MHLW criteria categorize the effects of psychotropic drugs on driving performance into four levels based on their magnitude and duration. Furthermore, the MHLW criteria could help to determine which clinical trials are necessary to evaluate the persistence of clinically meaningful impairment. Namely, the MHLW criteria could be used to structure the substantial evidence needed for evaluating the effects on driving performance for approval applications and clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingGuidelines as TopicPractice Guidelines as TopicPsychotropic DrugsHumansJapanPsychotropic Drugscriteriadriving impairmentguidelinespsychotropic drugstemporal profile

Identifiers

PMID41672882
PMCPMC12893847

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.