ArticleNature communications2026
The human metabolome and machine learning improves predictions of the post-mortem interval.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in forensic science: a systematic review. Part II: long-range postmortem interval estimation.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Pooled it
- From biochemical markers to machine learning: a review of postmortem interval estimation via vitreous humor analysis.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
- Development of a mobile application to estimate time of death based on the compound method.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Integrated renal histopathology, RNA decay, and protein degradation signatures enhance post-mortem interval prediction using machine-learning models in a veterinary forensic rat model.Veterinary world · 2026Article
- Human-to-Rat Validation of PMI Biomarkers: A Bidirectional Cross-Species Metabolomics Study Reveals Asymmetric Translation.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Detecting and subtyping ketoacidosis from metabolomic patterns in forensic casework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Targeted metabolomics of postmortem human cardiac tissue using the Biocrates MxP Quant 500 kit.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An accurate prediction of the time since death, known as the post-mortem interval, remains a critical research question in forensic and police investigations. Current methods, such as rectal temperature and vitreous potassium levels, only provide reliable post-mortem interval estimations up to 1-3 days. In this study, we use metabolomic data from routine toxicological screenings using femoral whole blood samples (n=4876 individuals) with known post-mortem interval of 1-67 days. We develop a neural network model that predicts the post-mortem interval with a mean/median absolute error of 1.45/1.03 days in unseen test cases, outperforming six other machine learning architectures. Pseudo-time series clustering of important model features reveals distinct metabolite dynamics, including markers of lipid degradation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and proteolysis. To assess generalizability, we apply the trained model to independent test data (n = 512 individuals) collected in a different year and analyzed on a separate mass spectrometry platform. Despite cross-platform variability, the model retains predictive performance (mean/median absolute error 1.78/1.29 days). We further show that robust models can be trained using only a few hundred cases, supporting scalability. Our findings demonstrate that post-mortem metabolomics, even when derived from routine toxicological workflows, can enable accurate post-mortem interval predictions and may offer a transferable framework for future forensic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.