ArticleScientific reports2026
A pilot study on protocol consistency and graph metric reproducibility in microstructure-weighted connectomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The microstructure-weighted human connectome: network properties and structure-function correlations across spatial scales.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microstructure-weighted connectomes incorporate diffusion parameters into structural networks, offering a rich characterisation of brain connectivity. While these biologically-informed connectomes have shown sensitivity to pathology-related alterations (for example in multiple sclerosis), their reproducibility remains largely unexplored. In this study, we evaluated the consistency of connectomes weighted with tensor and Bingham-NODDI parameters, employing a four-shell acquisition protocol to ensure accurate fibre reconstruction. Phantom and in vivo (N=4) data were acquired to assess temporal, inter-site and inter-protocol reproducibility of weighting parameters and inter-site stability of graph metrics. High reproducibility was observed for fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and intra-neurite (INVF) and intra-cellular (ICVF) volume fractions, with coefficients of variation (CVs) below 5% and negligible Bland-Altman biases. Orientation dispersion index and β concentration parameter showed CVs above 5% and were excluded from connectome construction. Graph metrics extracted from FA-, MD- and INVF-weighted connectomes exhibited good consistency, except for modularity. Extra-cellular volume fraction (ECVF)-weighted connectomes showed poor reproducibility (CV>5%, intraclass correlation coefficient <0.5). These preliminary findings demonstrate the reliability of microstructure-weighted connectomes, identifying the weighting strategies and graph metrics with the highest reproducibility. This supports the use of network metrics derived from weighted connectomes as potential biomarkers of altered brain connectivity in neurological disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.