ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning-based detection of retinal detachment with vitreous hemorrhage in ocular ultrasound images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinal detachment (RD) is a serious ocular disease that can lead to permanent vision loss. In cases with fundus-obscuring vitreous hemorrhage (VH), it is difficult to detect RD even using ocular ultrasonography. We developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) based on the You Only Look Once version 5 (YOLOv5) architecture to detect RD and VH on B-scan ultrasound images. The model was trained using 2,188 images and validated using 1,042 images. We applied image enhancement techniques, including unsharp masking (UM), to improve the detection accuracy. The final model (Incorporating fivefold cross-validation along with previous techniques) achieved overall accuracies of 96.6%, 99.2%, and 98.0% for RD, VH, and RD with VH, respectively. Our deep-learning algorithm showed high accuracy in detecting RD and VH on ocular ultrasound images. In cases with fundus-obscuring VH, our deep-learning algorithm might be useful for detecting RD as a supportive tool on ocular ultrasound images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.