ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2026
Dental service utilisation and perceptions amongst Indian rural children with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Multifactorial Evaluation of Parental Oral Health Literacy, Attitudinal Construct, and Clinical Oral Disease Burden in Children and Youth With Special Health Care Need (CYSHCN) in India.Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe present study investigated the factors affecting dental visits and the perceived need for dental care amongst children and adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) living in rural India.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using a convenience sample of 160 caregivers, of whom 79% were mothers with a mean age of 32 ± 8.67 years, caring for children with a mean age of 7.45 ± 3.72 years. The caregivers completed a questionnaire that explored various factors affecting dental service utilisation and perceived need for dental care. Indicators of influencing factors were adopted from validated instruments assessing healthcare access and including demographic and socioeconomic variables. Simple univariable logistic regression models were fitted to determine the odds of dental visits and perceived dental need.
resultsTwenty-three per cent of participants reported dental visits, whilst 29% perceived a need for dental care. Factors that significantly affected dental visits were demographic variables such as type of disability (OR 3.34; 95% CI 1.32, 8.48), child's age (OR 4.87; 95% CI 1.59, 14.91), and the availability of information regarding oral care (OR 3.51; 95% CI 1.56, 7.90). Other factors that significantly affected dental utilisation were caregivers' perception regarding child's oral health (OR 3.67; 95% CI 1.68, 8.02) and the proximity to dental clinics (OR 4.18; 95% CI 1.56, 11.15). Similarly, these variables were associated with increased odds of perceived need for dental care, except for the caregiver's perception of the child's oral health (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.09, 0.46). Additionally, caregivers' perception of the quality of dental care impacted their perceived need for care (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.67, 0.94).
conclusionDental visits and perceived need for care were low amongst children and adolescents with IDD in rural India. The lack of information, proximity to dental clinics and quality of care affected dental service utilisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.