ArticleBMC cancer2026
Assessing the covariates of delay in seeking health care among patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in Tanzania.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 5-year survival rate for advanced-stage oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is as low as 20%. The poor prognosis of OPSCC in Tanzania is attributed to delays in diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to assess the patients’ perceived reasons for delay and the magnitude of delay in attending for care and diagnosis among OPSCC patients in Tanzania.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at the Muhimbili National Hospital, in Tanzania. Information on delay in healthcare seeking was collected from 236 OPSCC patients. Magnitude of delay was recoded from initial symptom(s) to first consultation (Primary delay, PD), from first consultation to diagnosis (Secondary delay, SD), and from initial symptom(s) to diagnosis (diagnostic delay, DD). Factors contributing to PD and SD were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the association of covariates with delays. The statistical significance was decided at p < 0.05.
resultsOut of 236 OPSCC patients, 61% (n = 144) were males, and the mean age was 57.4 years. Primary delay (PD) had a median of 16 (IQR 4–20) weeks, with 86% delaying beyond 90 days. The median (range) of Secondary delay (SD) and diagnostic delay DD were 4 (IQR 2–10) weeks and 29 (IQR 10–64) weeks, respectively. Up to 89.4% of OPSCC patients perceived initial lesions as indolent and less worrisome. Factors contributing to PD were: lack of awareness (99.3%), lack of funds (75.8%), negligence (72.9%), and use of alternative therapies (56.8%). The use of alternative medicines, inadequate capacity to detect OPSCC by Primary Health Care Clinicians (PHCC), and the referral challenges were the main contributors to the SD. The covariates of PD were low financial capacity (aOR 2.474, 95% CI 1.076–51.684), while being single (aOR 0.379, 95% CI 0.161–0.888), and having poor Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores (aOR 0.320, 95% CI 0.106–0.968) were associated with a lower likelihood of PD.
conclusionLack of awareness, financial constraints, and reliance on alternative medicine were major contributors to both primary and secondary delays, ultimately prolonging diagnostic delay. Raising community awareness, early detection of OPSCC lesions, and streamlining of referral process can assist in reducing delays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.