ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2026
Lost to follow-up while undergoing intravitreal injection therapy: barriers to adherence in a real-world setting.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration from China: 48-week results from the PULSAR trial.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntravitreal anti‑VEGF therapy is effective, yet real‑world outcomes are limited by non persistence. We investigated patient‑reported reasons for discontinuation under pro-re-nata therapy protocol.
methodsThis ambispective real-world study at a German eye hospital evaluated patients receiving intravitreal therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), or neovascular age related macular degeneration (nAMD) using the pro re nata (PRN) protocol. Patient records were reviewed, and those meeting lost to follow up (LTFU) criteria (no injections or visits within 3 months) were contacted via written letter and phone. When patients were reached surveys to assess reasons for LTFU, perceived treatment burden, mobility, and comorbidities were completed.
resultsOf 657 cases, 347 (52.8%) met the LTFU- criteria, 25 of which were medically indicated. Despite multiple attempts, contact and data collection was successful for only 39 patients (response rate: 12%), major part was unwilling or unable to participate. The most common reasons for discontinuation were subjective lack of treatment need (56%), perception of being “fully treated” (33%), fear of injections (26%), travel difficulties (28%), and time burden (15%). Despite these barriers, 52% of patients reported that the treatment was “not burdensome at all,” while 3 patients (8%) continued therapy elsewhere.
conclusionsIn this exploratory, single-centre cohort, a significant portion of patients had effectively disengaged from IVI care and were unreceptive to delayed outreach. Outcome-related perceptions and organizational hurdles were key, actionable barriers. Future strategies to improve adherence should focus on proactive follow-ups shortly after therapy discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.