Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41674155›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2026

Changes in harm perceptions of e-cigarettes compared with cigarettes following the announcement of the disposable vape ban in Great Britain.

Sarah E Jackson, Jamie Brown, Catherine Kimber, Katherine East, Emke Brazier, Sharon Cox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah E JacksonDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5658-6168
Jamie BrownDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2797-5428
Catherine KimberNicotine, Tobacco and Vaping Research Group, College of Health and Life Sciences, London South Bank University, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9994-8640
Katherine EastDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton and University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9083-2131
Emke BrazierNicotine, Tobacco and Vaping Research Group, College of Health and Life Sciences, London South Bank University, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0000-6479-6376
Sharon CoxDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8494-5105

Funding

Behavioral Research UK Leadership Hub which is supported by the Economic and Social Research CouncilCancer Research UK PICCTR-2024/100001Cancer Research UK PRCRPG-Nov21\100002Economic and Social Research Council ES/Y001044/1US National Institutes of Health 1P01CA200512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionE-cigarettes ("vapes") are less harmful than cigarettes and effective for smoking cessation. However, public perceptions of their relative harms have worsened over the past decade. In January 2024, the UK government announced a forthcoming ban on disposable e-cigarettes, which received extended media coverage. Concerns were raised that this could exacerbate negative harm perceptions.

methodsWe conducted a repeat cross-sectional study using monthly data from the Smoking Toolkit Study (January 2022-June 2025, the month the ban was implemented). Segmented regression models assessed changes in relative harm perceptions of e-cigarettes versus cigarettes before and after the January 2024 announcement. Participants were 16 489 people (≥16 years) in Great Britain who smoked.

resultsTrends in harm perceptions changed following the announcement of the ban on disposable e-cigarettes. Between January 2022 and January 2024, the proportion who believed e-cigarettes were less harmful declined (RR = 0.804 [95% CI = 0.764-0.846]), while those believing e-cigarettes were more (RR = 1.300 [1.226-1.379]) or equally harmful (RR = 1.078 [1.033-1.124]) increased, and the proportion unsure decreased (RR = 0.859 [0.805-0.917]). Following the policy announcement, the decline in less harmful perceptions and increase in more harmful perceptions both decelerated significantly (post-announcement trends: RR = 0.922 [0.806-1.055]; RR = 1.073 [0.939-1.227]). By June 2025, 18.7% [17.1%-20.5%] believed e-cigarettes were less harmful, 31.3% [29.1%-33.7%] more harmful, 37.5% [35.5%-39.6%] equally harmful, and 12.5% [10.9%-14.3%] were unsure.

conclusionsConcerns that the UK government's 2024 vaping policy announcement would exacerbate worsening trends in negative harm perceptions of e-cigarettes among people who smoke appeared unfounded: the rate of deterioration in harm perceptions actually slowed significantly to June 2025. However, harm perceptions still declined, albeit more slowly, and a large proportion of people who smoke continue to hold misperceptions about the relative harms of e-cigarettes. IMPLICATIONS: Misperceptions about the relative harms of e-cigarettes remain common among people who smoke in Great Britain. The slowing of negative trends following the disposable ban announcement suggests the policy announcement did not worsen deteriorating harm perceptions as feared. Nonetheless, with only one in five adults who smoke recognizing that e-cigarettes are less harmful than cigarettes, clear communication from public health bodies, government, and via the media is needed to address ongoing misconceptions. Future research should assess whether implementation of the ban in June 2025 has different effects on harm perceptions.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsVapingAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionSmoking CessationUnited KingdomYoung Adultdisposable vapese-cigarettesharm perceptionsrisk perceptionsmoking cessationvaping policy

Identifiers

PMID41674155
PMCPMC13389525

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.