ArticleCirculation2026
Second- and Third-Generation BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and the Risk of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Prevalent New-User Design.
Article in Circulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBCR-ABL (fusion between the Abelson [Abl] tyrosine kinase gene at chromosome 9 and the break point cluster [Bcr] gene at chromosome 22) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been increasingly linked to pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) since 2009, although supporting evidence is limited. Our objective was to evaluate the risk of PAH associated with second- and third-generation BCR-ABL TKIs compared with imatinib in adults.
methodsWe employed a prevalent new-user design that emulates a randomized trial within the French national health care database population between 2008 and 2024. Thus, subjects initiating a second- and third-generation BCR-ABL TKI were matched on time and propensity score with users of the first-generation BCR-ABL TKI, imatinib. Patients were followed to occurrence of the primary outcome (ie, new onset of PAH), switch to another BCR-ABL TKI, death from any cause, end of registration within the database, or end of the study period, whichever came first. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models, and incidence rates and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated using the Poisson distribution.
resultsSix thousand six hundred twenty-five dasatinib (age 59.7±15.2 years, 44.0% women), 5205 nilotinib (age 55.4±15.0 years, 44.2% women), 2421 bosutinib (age 63.8±14.2 years, 42.1% women),1358 ponatinib (age 57.3±14.9 years, 46.1% women), and 922 asciminib (age 64.3±13.8 years, 43.7% female) new users were each matched with the maximum of available imatinib users on time-conditional propensity score and on duration of prior imatinib use (prevalent users). Dasatinib use was associated with a 9-fold increased risk of PAH compared with imatinib (1829 versus 43 events per million persons per year; HR=8.89 [95% CI, 5.30-14.92]). Bosutinib and ponatinib were associated with HRs of 10.76 (95% CI, 4.68-24.73) and 7.74 (95% CI, 2.33-25.70) respectively, with most cases occurring in patients previously exposed to dasatinib. Nilotinib and asciminib were not associated with an increased risk of PAH.
conclusionsThis study, designed to emulate a randomized trial, suggests that, in French patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with BCR-ABL TKIs, dasatinib use is associated with a higher risk of PAH compared with imatinib, while bosutinib and ponatinib exposure may aggravate or trigger a recurrence of PAH in patients with preexisting dasatinib exposure. Whether bosutinib and ponatinib could induce PAH without preexposure to dasatinib remains to be explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.