ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
From awareness to action: exploring health information seeking behavior in coronary heart disease patients: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a major global health burden requiring long-term management. Despite the essential role of health information seeking behavior (HISB) in disease self-management, current levels among CHD patients remain low, and research on its influencing factors is limited. Objectives: This study aimed to explore HISB among patients with CHD and to identify factors associated with variations in HISB using the Risk Perception Attitude (RPA) framework. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 330 CHD patients was conducted in China, using convenience sampling method. Data were collected through validated questionnaires assessing sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, HISB, risk perception, and self-efficacy. K-means clustering based on the RPA framework was employed to empirically identify distinct patient subgroups. Multivariate linear regression identified factors associated with of HISB within each subgroup. Results: Four distinct subgroups were identified based on risk perception and self-efficacy: Responsive (6.7%), Proactive (41.2%), Indifference (8.2%), and Avoidance (43.9%). Multivariate regression revealed subgroup-specific factors: for Responsive, physical diagnosis and treatment risk was significant [β = 2.049, 95%CI (0.528,3.570)]; For Proactive, higher education [β = 4.725, 95%CI (2.272,7.178)], per capita monthly household income and self-efficacy were positively associated, while type of medical insurance [β = -5.814, 95%CI (-8.800, -2.828)], number of other diseases, and economic risk were negative predictors; For Indifference, only type of medical insurance was significant [β = -6.447, 95%CI (-12.503, -0.391)]; For Avoidance, older age was linked to lower HISB [β = -4.757, 95%CI (-8.525, -0.989)], whereas higher education increased it [β = 5.432, 95%CI (2.353, 8.511)]. Conclusions: This study validates the heterogeneity of CHD patients through RPA-based subgrouping, revealing that health information seeking behaviors are driven by distinct psychological and socioeconomic mechanisms across different groups. These findings underscore the limitation of uniform health education approaches and highlight the necessity of implementing subgroup-tailored strategies. By aligning clinical and public health interventions with the specific psychographic profiles of patient groups, healthcare providers can significantly enhance the precision and effectiveness of chronic disease management. Registration: www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2300069238.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.