ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Unseen Insights: An AI-Powered Exploration of Secure Patient Messages in Ophthalmology.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To characterize the clinical and administrative concerns communicated through secure ophthalmology messaging and to assess differences in message content across patient sociodemographic groups. Design: Cross-sectional study of de-identified, patient-initiated secure messages sent between June 2014 and July 2024. Participants: Patients with ophthalmic conditions who initiated secure electronic health record portal messages. Of 48 516 extracted message threads, 30 390 patient medical advice request messages from 4 817 unique patients were included after exclusion of questionnaires, courtesy messages, and clinician responses. Participants were 55.5% female, 56.9% aged 50 years or older, 48.7% White, and 85.7% non-Hispanic. Methods: Natural language processing and large language model-assisted topic classification were used to categorize message content. Differences in message frequency by demographic subgroup were assessed using 2-proportion z tests. Main Outcomes and Measures: Distribution of message topics and frequency of clinical concerns stratified by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and marital status. Results: Nearly half of all messages addressed administrative issues, including scheduling, medication refills, and insurance. Among clinical concerns, vision disturbances (20.8%), glaucoma-related symptoms (8.7%), imaging or tumor-related questions (7.5%), and postoperative concerns (7.4%) were most common. Message content differed significantly by demographic characteristics. Non-White patients more frequently raised issues related to pharmacy refills, insurance, glaucoma, and disability documentation, whereas White patients more often reported surgical concerns. Older patients more frequently messaged about glaucoma, surgery, and tumor-related issues, while female patients more often reported complications and swelling or infection. Conclusions: Secure patient messages frequently include clinically relevant symptoms with potential triage implications and demonstrate demographic differences in care-seeking behavior. Systematic analysis of message content may support safer triage, improved workflow efficiency, and more equitable delivery of ophthalmic care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.