Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41674998›Full record

ReviewInterventional cardiology (London, England)2026

Workflow-based Framework to Aid with High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound-Optimised Coronary Stenting: Introducing IVUS 123 Essentials.

Simon J Walsh, Rafael Cavalcante, Kevin Croce, Colm G Hanratty, Hayder Hashim, Francis Joshi, Sanjog Kalra, Ajay Kirtane, Akiko Maehara, Margaret McEntegart and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Interventional cardiology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Simon J WalshCardiology Department, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Royal Victoria Hospital Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9787-6524
Rafael CavalcanteBoston Scientific Maple Grove, MN, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0158-811X
Kevin CroceDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, MA, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8519-4726
Colm G HanrattyCardiology Department, Mater Private Hospital Dublin, Ireland.
Hayder HashimCardiology Department, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington DC, US.
Francis JoshiCardiology Department, Golden Jubilee National Hospital Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Sanjog KalraPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2768-8779
Ajay KirtaneCardiology Department, Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York, NY, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0061-1058
Akiko MaeharaCardiology Department, Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York, NY, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1910-8447
Margaret McEntegartCardiology Department, Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York, NY, US.
Robert F RileyCardiology Department, Overlake Medical Center Bellevue, WA, US.
James C SprattCardiology Department, St George's Hospital, University of London London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8719-4538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been in clinical use for more than three decades. Despite evidence that supports the application of the technology from multiple registries, randomised trials and meta-analyses, adoption remains low. Potential barriers to the adoption of IVUS are a lack of understanding as to how to accurately interpret images and how to incorporate it into clinical workflow. To address this, this paper summarises evidence-based protocols for the application of IVUS during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) into an easily understood workflow. Standardisation of approaches and wider adoption of IVUS-optimised PCI should improve patient outcomes and PCI durability.

Indexed as

intravascular ultrasoundpatient outcomesPercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID41674998
PMCPMC12888101

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.