ArticleTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer2026
Eligibility for adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: insights from a large cohort in central south China.
Article in Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The MonarchE and NATALEE trials have established adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors (abemaciclib and ribociclib) as pivotal therapies for high-risk hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (EBC). However, real-world data regarding the populations eligible for these trials remains limited, especially in Asian cohorts, highlighting the need for data that bridges the gap between trial findings and clinical practice in diverse settings. We conducted this real-world study in a central Chinese population to identify patient characteristics potentially associated with clinical benefits from CDK4/6 inhibitors such as abemaciclib and ribociclib. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 1,947 patients with stage I-III HR+ invasive breast cancer (BC) treated at Xiangya Hospital, China, from 2015 to 2021. The clinicopathological profiles of patients meeting the eligibility criteria of the MonarchE and NATALEE trials were compared. Eligibility was defined according to trial-specific inclusion criteria: MonarchE required ≥4 positive lymph nodes (LNs) or 1-3 LNs with tumor size ≥5 cm or grade 3 histology (Cohort 1), or 1-3 LNs with Ki-67 ≥20% (Cohort 2). NATALEE included stage IIB-III and high-risk stage IIA (T2N0 with grade 3 or Ki-67 ≥20%). Results: Among the cohort, 26.7% (n=519) met MonarchE criteria, with a higher proportion of grade 3 tumors (25.2%) and T3 disease (17.9%). The cohort was composed of 70.7% of Cohort 1 and 29.3% of Cohort 2. In Cohort 1, 36.5% of patients exhibited 1-3 node-positive disease with high-risk biological features. In contrast, 58.0% (n=1,130) were eligible for NATALEE, including 295 stage III, 417 stage IIB, and 312 node-negative (N0) patients with high-risk biological characteristics (26.0% grade 3; 85.3% Ki-67 ≥20%). NATALEE-eligible patients were older (median age 50 Conclusions: These findings challenge the traditional nodal-centric risk stratification model and highlight important disparities in the patient populations defined by trial eligibility criteria. The data suggest that nearly 60% of HR+ EBC patients may qualify for adjuvant ribociclib therapy under NATALEE criteria, indicating a broader therapeutic eligibility than previously recognized and emphasizing the need for a more inclusive, biology-driven approach to treatment selection in HR+ EBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.