ReviewiScience2026
CAR-T cell therapies are coming after glioblastoma: An overview of early phase clinical trials and future perspectives.
Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase I Study of Cellular ImmunoTx Using Memory Enriched T Cells Lentivirally Transduced to Express an IL13Rα2-Specific, Hinge-Optimized, 41BB-Costimulatory Chimeric Receptor and a Truncated CD19 for Pts With Rec/Ref MaligGlioma
Phase 1, Open-label Study Evaluating the Safety and Feasibility of CART-EGFR-IL13Ra2 Cells in Patients With EGFR-Amplified Recurrent Glioblastoma
INCIPIENT: INtraventricular CARv3-TEAM-E T Cells for PatIENTs With GBM
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming resistance in glioblastoma immunotherapy: lessons from the past and opportunities for the future.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Review
- Dual-modality imaging enables longitudinal biodistribution profiling of intracerebroventricular CAR-T therapy in orthotopic glioma.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrent glioblastoma has no established standard of care, and survival remains limited to a few months. Recent clinical evidence suggests that the intracranial delivery of CAR-T cells is feasible and shows signs of antitumor activity. In the phase I trial NCT02208362, anti-IL13Rα2 CAR-T cells were tested in 65 patients, yielding a 50% disease-control rate and 23% one-year survival. Two phase I studies of multi-target CAR-T products (NCT05168423, the ongoing NCT05660369) similarly showed bioactivity and early but transient radiological responses. Importantly, the intracranial route enabled rich translational research: serial biopsies and cerebrospinal fluid sampling allowed assessment of CAR-T cells function at the tumor site and the identification of candidate predictive biomarkers. In this review, we compare the designs and findings of these three studies and synthesize key lessons. We also outline future perspectives to improve the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy in solid tumors, with a focus on glioblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.