Evidence mapPaperPMID 41675093Full record

ArticlemHealth2026

Tailoring mobile health apps for lifestyle management: a discrete choice experiment.

Chiara Seghieri, Tallys Feldens, Costanza Tortù, Natalya Usheva, Florian Toti, Ditila Doracaj, Natalia Giménez-Legarre, Eva Karaglani, Yannis Manios

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05648383 (An Intersectoral Innovative Solution Involving DIGItal Tools, Empowering Families and Integrating Community CARE Services for the Prevention and Management of Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05648383 nacompletednot on this map

An Intersectoral Innovative Solution Involving DIGItal Tools, Empowering Families and Integrating Community CARE Services for the Prevention and Management of Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension

TypeinterventionalSponsorHarokopio UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled1,215ConditionsType 2 Diabetes, PreDiabetes, Hypertension, Obesity & OverweightArmsmHealth self-management intervention, Standard care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chiara SeghieriDepartment of L'EMbeDS, Institute of Management, Sant'Anna School for Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3910-7775
Tallys FeldensDepartment of L'EMbeDS, Institute of Management, Sant'Anna School for Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1804-8315
Costanza TortùDepartment of L'EMbeDS, Institute of Management, Sant'Anna School for Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2561-9726
Natalya UshevaDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Care Organization, Medical University of Varna, Varna, Bulgaria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4228-3152
Florian TotiService of Endocrinology & Metabolic Diseases, University of Medicine of Tirana, Tirana, Albania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2097-1766
Ditila DoracajDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Medicine of Tirana, Tirana, Albania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6198-8890
Natalia Giménez-LegarreGrowth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development (GENUD) Research Group, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2956-4219
Eva KaraglaniDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Science and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5395-7023
Yannis ManiosDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Science and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6486-114X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Health apps designed to monitor, motivate, and educate people towards their health goals are getting more users and features each time. These apps offer valuable support for self-managing health behaviors and achieving long-term objectives. However, there is limited understanding of user preferences regarding essential app features. The aim of the study is to get insights about potential users' preferences, in order to tailor better apps for lifestyle management. Methods: We conducted a three-part web survey with 389 respondents from four countries as part of the DigiCare4You European Union (EU) project. In the first part, we collected the socioeconomic characteristics and health status of each respondent. In the following stage, we asked five questions on a Likert scale to ascertain the individual level of usage and general attitude towards technology. Finally, we performed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) using an unlabeled design and estimated the odds ratio for each feature using conditional logit analysis. We also ran alternative estimations stratifying by non-communicable disease (NCD) patients and non-NCD patients, and explored latent profile analysis (LPA) to understand whether the general attitude towards technology impacts the preference pattern between users. Results: The DCE revealed that respondents showed a clear preference for monitoring physical health over emotional status. They favored receiving lifestyle achievement notifications weekly rather than daily, and daily rather than more frequently. Similarly, respondents preferred uploading body weight measurements on a weekly or monthly basis rather than daily. Users expressed a preference for collaborating with their doctors to set exercise and diet goals, rather than either deciding independently or delegating entirely to their doctors. End-users also show a pattern of preferring notifications for goals instead of challenging other users. Preferences regarding the subjects of health content between workout routines, food recipes, and new scientific evidence were not significant; also, no statistical significance was found for the decision between follow-up visits with their doctor in person or remotely. LPA returned two groups regarding their general attitude towards technology: a lower, an intermediate, and a higher usage in their private life based on their responses to the questionnaire. Stratified DCEs have shown heterogeneity of users' preferences according to their specific attitude towards technology. Conclusions: Our study indicates that potential mobile health (mHealth) app users managing chronic conditions prefer platforms that enable shared responsibility with their doctors in defining health goals while having an intermediate level of interaction frequency with the app. These findings are key to tailoring mHealth apps that can optimize motivation triggers, support healthier lifestyles, and empower patients with chronic conditions.

Indexed as

discrete choice experiment (DCE)lifestyle managementMobile health app (mHealth app)preferences

Identifiers

PMID41675093
PMCPMC12885856

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.