Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41675368›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

The 5-point Modified Frailty Index in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Meta-analysis.

Ron Skorochod, Yoav Gronovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ron SkorochodFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Yoav GronovichFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Frailty is regarded as a key predictor of adverse surgical outcomes. The 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) offers a simplified version of the validated 11-item risk stratification tool. Despite its use across surgical fields, its utility in plastic and reconstructive surgery remains underexplored. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and quantify the predictive value of frailty, as measured by the mFI-5 on postoperative outcomes in adult patients undergoing plastic and reconstructive surgery. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically queried for studies comparing adverse events in frail (mFI-5 ≥ 2) versus nonfrail patients undergoing plastic and reconstructive surgery. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the risk of bias in non-randomized studies-of interventions tool, with evidence quality evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation approach. Outcomes included surgical, medical, and any complications, readmission, reoperation, and mortality. Subgroup analyses were conducted by subject of study, database source, and study sample size. Results: Twenty-nine studies encompassing 302,641 patients were included. Frailty was significantly associated with increased odds of complications, readmission, reoperation, and mortality. Subgroup analyses by procedure type, database, and sample size consistently confirmed elevated risk across all outcomes, with varying degrees of statistical significance. Conclusions: Frailty, as measured by the mFI-5, is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, hospital readmission, reoperation, and mortality in plastic and reconstructive surgery patients. These findings support the integration of the index in clinical practice and preoperative patient evaluation and decision-making.

Identifiers

PMID41675368
PMCPMC12889236

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.