Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41675405›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The interactive influence mechanism of visual and olfactory stimuli on college students' preferences for campus green spaces.

Yue Xu, Sheng Gao, Xuyan Hu, Yanming Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yue XuSchool of Art and Design, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing, China.
Sheng GaoSchool of Art and Design, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing, China.
Xuyan HuSchool of Art and Design, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing, China.
Yanming WuSchool of Art and Design, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a core environmental setting in students' daily lives and studies, campus green spaces have a direct impact on cognitive performance and psychological well-being. Grounded in Attention Restoration Theory, this study investigates the interactive effects of olfactory-visual stimuli on college students' perceptual evaluation of campus green spaces and their restorative experiences. The experimental site of this study is Nanjing Institute of Technology in East China, where we employ systematic measurement methods to analyze the interactive psychological impact of olfactory and visual stimuli. Using rosemary and camphor leaves as representative aromatic plant substances, a comprehensive assessment of students' emotional states and environmental perceptions is conducted through eye tracking, blood pressure monitoring, and attention tests. Finally, based on the empirical findings, corresponding strategies to improve multisensory landscape design in campus green spaces are proposed. The results indicate that the visual system is primarily responsible for spatial structure recognition, while the olfactory system is more involved in emotional regulation and atmosphere creation. Plant aromas directly influence physiological and emotional states, and modulate visual landscape evaluations through cross-modal mechanisms, thereby enhancing restorative effects compared to visual-only designs. This study validates the value of integrating environmental perception into campus landscape design, transcending the limitations of traditional single-sensory evaluation models. The findings contribute to the development of campus environment systems oriented toward physical and mental well-being.

Indexed as

campus green spacesinfluence mechanismmultisensory integrationrestorative experiencevisual–olfactory perception

Identifiers

PMID41675405
PMCPMC12885984

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.