Evidence mapPaperPMID 41675591Full record

ArticleMolecular neurodegeneration advances2026

Distinct CSF lipidomic profiles are associated with five proteomic subtypes in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Georgia Malliou, Lianne M Reus, Yolande A L Pijnenburg, Wiesje M van der Flier, Nienke M de Wit, Serhii Chornyi, Gijs Kooij, Helga E de Vries, Charlotte E Teunissen, P J Visser and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurodegeneration advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Georgia MalliouAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lianne M ReusAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Yolande A L PijnenburgAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Wiesje M van der FlierEpidemiology & Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nienke M de WitDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Serhii ChornyiDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gijs KooijDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Helga E de VriesDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Charlotte E TeunissenAmsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
P J VisserAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Roel A OphoffCenter for Neurobehavioral Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, CA USA.
Betty M TijmsAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is molecularly heterogeneous. In our previous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomic study in AD, we identified and validated five distinct molecular subtypes characterized by neuronal hyperplasticity (subtype 1), innate immune activation (subtype 2), RNA dysregulation (subtype 3), choroid plexus dysfunction (subtype 4) and blood-brain barrier impairment (subtype 5). These subtypes also differed in the CSF levels of proteins involved in lipid metabolism, suggesting that lipid dysregulation in AD might be subtype specific. Methods: We performed untargeted lipidomics on CSF samples from 601 individuals in the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort who were previously included in our proteomic study (n = 416 AD, 185 controls). Using the CSH-QTOF platform for complex lipids, 3,532 lipids were detected in CSF, 270 of which could be mapped to 13 different lipid classes. Lipid levels were compared between each AD subtype and controls using linear regression models adjusted for age and sex (R v4.2.1). Lipids with significantly different levels (p < 0.05) were included for pathway enrichment analysis with MetaboAnalyst6.0. Results: We observed alterations in the levels of 1,893 lipids, with the majority associated with a single AD subtype. Subtype 3 (RNA dysregulation) exhibited the most pronounced alterations, with altered CSF levels of 669 lipids, including triglycerides and fatty acids, which were reduced compared to controls. Subtype 4 (choroid plexus dysfunction) and subtype 5 (blood-brain barrier dysfunction) both had alterations in the same set of 150 lipids, but with changes occurring in opposite directions (i.e., decreased in subtype 4, and increased in subtype 5). These lipids were associated with sphingolipid metabolism and lipid transport. Subtype 1 (neuronal hyperplasticity) and subtype 2 (innate immune activation) had less pronounced differences compared to the other subtypes. Subtype 1 had increased levels of several phospholipids, indicating neuronal membrane remodeling, and subtype 2 decreased arachidonic acid levels, a precursor of immunoregulatory oxylipins. Conclusion: Our findings reveal subtype-specific lipid metabolism alterations in AD. Currently, five lipid-targeting drugs are in phase 1 and 2 trials. Our results suggest that treatment efficacy may vary by subtype. Understanding these molecular differences can inform trial design and analysis, advancing the development of tailored therapies for AD. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44477-026-00018-z.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseHeterogeneityLipid metabolismLipidomicsMolecular subtypes

Identifiers

PMID41675591
PMCPMC12886218

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.