ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Systematic review of the impact of digital health technologies on blood pressure control and treatment adherence in young and middle-aged hypertensive patients.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Divide or Compensatory Dividend? The Longitudinal Impact of Smart Health Monitoring on Intrinsic Capacity Trajectories.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Digital Health Delivery Models for Hypertension Self-Care in Asia: A Systematic Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Experiences of young adults with cardiovascular disease in using digital health: a protocol for a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis from the perspective of media affordances.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this work is to evaluate the effect of digital intervention technologies on blood pressure management and medication adherence in hypertensive individuals aged 18-59 years and to explore pathways for precise health management. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to April 2025 were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and four major Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang Data, and Vip Journal Integration Platform). The intervention group received digital interventions such as mobile health apps, remote monitoring, or smart wearable devices, while the control group received routine health education. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used for literature quality assessment, and data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results: A total of 12 studies ( Conclusion: Digital health interventions can improve blood pressure control in young and middle-aged hypertensive patients and show potential to enhance medication adherence. However, the observed high heterogeneity and differential effects based on intervention duration suggest that effectiveness may vary. This study provides evidence-based support for the application of digital tools in chronic disease management, while highlighting the need for more tailored and standardized approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.