Evidence mapPaperPMID 41675626Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Cardiovascular risk stratification in inflammatory-driven conditions: how far have we come?

Gustavo L R Silva, Andrei C Sposito, Otavio Coelho-Filho, Thiago Quinaglia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gustavo L R SilvaDiscipline of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Science, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Andrei C SpositoDiscipline of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Science, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Otavio Coelho-FilhoDiscipline of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Science, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Thiago QuinagliaDiscipline of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Science, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk stratification has predominantly relied on conventional risk factors such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and family history of premature ASCVD. These features, while important, often fail to capture the complex interplay of contributors to ASCVD. Inflammation is involved in the initiation, progression, and destabilization of atherosclerotic plaques. However, it has not been consistently included in cardiovascular risk stratification tools which are crucial to trigger interventions and prevent events. Thus, there has been a growing interest in incorporating inflammatory biomarkers into ASCVD risk assessment. Two researchers entered the search terms: "cardiovascular" AND "risk stratification" AND "inflammation" AND alternately the following aditional terms: "primary prevention" OR "secondary prevention" OR "residual risk" OR "inflammatory disease" in the PubMed and Open Evidence platforms. In total, 25 studies were analysed and discussed: 1 meta-analysis, 15 cohort studies, 9 cross-sectional studies. Other studies were included to support the evidence and provide context. Inflammatory-driven conditions can lead to a 24% to almost three-fold increase in cardiovascular mortality risk compared with the general population even in the absence of traditional risk factors. Furthermore, stratification of inflammatory-driven risk is largely unexplored in primary and secondary (residual risk) prevention. Traditional scores are least effective in the intermediate-risk group where a proportion of over 50% of individuals are misclassified. In secondary prevention, estimates show that 38% of individuals persist with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and these patients exhibit higher all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke rates at one year. In this review we aim to gather and appraise studies presenting alternatives to traditional risk assessment that consider the inflammatory contribution to cardiovascular events in primary and secondary prevention levels, as well as, in populations living with inflammatory-driven diseases.

Indexed as

cancercardiovascular riskHIVinflammationrheumatic and autoimmune disease

Identifiers

PMID41675626
PMCPMC12886439

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.