Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41675877›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026

Artificial intelligence in cardiology: an updated systematic review with ethical considerations and challenges in implementing artificial intelligence models.

Dev Patel, Reshmitha Kantamneni, Jabez David John, Tirath Patel, Arnesh Shukla, Ayesha Salma, Nikhilesh Anand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dev PatelDepartment of Medicine, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Reshmitha KantamneniDepartment of Medicine, Rangaraya Medical College, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Jabez David JohnDepartment of Medicine, Malla Reddy Institute of Medical Science, Hyderabad, India.
Tirath PatelDepartment of Medicine, Trinity Medical Sciences University School of Medicine, Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
Arnesh ShuklaDepartment of Medicine, St Martinus University, Willemstad, Curaçao.
Ayesha SalmaDepartment of Medicine, Shadan institute of medical sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Nikhilesh AnandDepartment of Medical Education, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in cardiovascular medicine presents a transformative opportunity to enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve patient outcomes. This systematic review evaluates the impact of AI on cardiovascular diagnostics with a focus on its ability to surpass traditional methods in accuracy, efficiency, and predictive capabilities. Machine learning and deep learning have demonstrated significant advancements in areas such as echocardiography, electrocardiography, computed tomography angiography, and predictive analytics. AI algorithms have demonstrated superior performance in identifying subtle patterns and anomalies. Additionally, AI has shown promise in predictive analytics, forecasting disease progression and tailoring treatment plans, thereby improving patient outcomes. Despite these advancements, significant gaps remain in our understanding of AI's full impact on cardiovascular medicine. Challenges such as the generalizability of AI models, ethical considerations, data privacy, issues related to data quality, clear guidelines on AI implementation in clinical practice and potential biases in AI algorithms warrant further investigation. Key findings indicate that AI systems consistently achieve higher diagnostic accuracy, reduce inter-observer variability, and facilitate earlier detection of cardiovascular conditions, leading to improved patient outcomes. In conclusion, AI holds substantial promise for improving diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes in cardiovascular medicine. This review provides valuable insights into the benefits and limitations of AI, guiding future research and clinical practice to ensure responsible and effective integration of AI technologies in cardiovascular health care.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCardiovascular diseaseDiagnostic accuracyEthical considerationsPatient outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41675877
PMCPMC12889380

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.