ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2026
The UK National Appeals Panel Safely Extends Access to Liver Transplantation for Candidates Beyond Standard Listing Criteria.
Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nurturing a Sustainable Transplantation Journey: the best of ESOT Congress 2025.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is the definitive treatment for selected acute and chronic liver diseases, yet standard national listing criteria do not encompass all clinical situations. To address this, the United Kingdom (UK) established the National Appeals Panel (NAP) in 2011 to review exceptional cases, aiming to ensure equitable access while safeguarding allocation of scarce donor organs. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all appeals submitted to the NAP between 2011 and 2020. 149 appeals were received: 139 (93.3%) adults and 10 (6.7%) paediatric patients. Overall, 128 (85.9%) appeals were approved, 19 (12.8%) declined, and 2 (1.3%) withdrawn. Approval was more frequent for adult super-urgent than elective requests (92.9% vs. 79.5%). Of 118 approved adults, 95 (80.5%) underwent LT, while 23 (19.5%) did not, most often due to deterioration on the waiting list. Transplanted adults included 46.3% super-urgent cases, with 20% ventilated and 25.3% on renal replacement therapy, yet achieved excellent outcomes with 98% one-year and 90% five-year survival. All 10 paediatric appeals were approved, with one child dying on the list and nine transplanted. Declined appeals mainly involved older patients with malignant indications. This review highlights the NAP's role in expanding LT access while ensuring equity and governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.