Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41675921›Full record

ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2026

The UK National Appeals Panel Safely Extends Access to Liver Transplantation for Candidates Beyond Standard Listing Criteria.

Abdul Rahman Hakeem, Sahil Gupta, Rhiannon Taylor, Tassos Grammatikopoulos, Steven Masson, Raj Prasad, Doug Thorburn, Krishna Menon, Derek Manas, Varuna Aluvihare

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Nurturing a Sustainable Transplantation Journey: the best of ESOT Congress 2025.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdul Rahman HakeemInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Sahil GuptaInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Rhiannon TaylorNHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Tassos GrammatikopoulosInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Steven MassonLiver Unit, Newcastle NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Raj PrasadLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Doug ThorburnRoyal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Krishna MenonInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Derek ManasNHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Varuna AluvihareInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver transplantation (LT) is the definitive treatment for selected acute and chronic liver diseases, yet standard national listing criteria do not encompass all clinical situations. To address this, the United Kingdom (UK) established the National Appeals Panel (NAP) in 2011 to review exceptional cases, aiming to ensure equitable access while safeguarding allocation of scarce donor organs. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all appeals submitted to the NAP between 2011 and 2020. 149 appeals were received: 139 (93.3%) adults and 10 (6.7%) paediatric patients. Overall, 128 (85.9%) appeals were approved, 19 (12.8%) declined, and 2 (1.3%) withdrawn. Approval was more frequent for adult super-urgent than elective requests (92.9% vs. 79.5%). Of 118 approved adults, 95 (80.5%) underwent LT, while 23 (19.5%) did not, most often due to deterioration on the waiting list. Transplanted adults included 46.3% super-urgent cases, with 20% ventilated and 25.3% on renal replacement therapy, yet achieved excellent outcomes with 98% one-year and 90% five-year survival. All 10 paediatric appeals were approved, with one child dying on the list and nine transplanted. Declined appeals mainly involved older patients with malignant indications. This review highlights the NAP's role in expanding LT access while ensuring equity and governance.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityLiver TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementWaiting ListsAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionRetrospective StudiesTissue Donorsdeclinesindicationsliver transplantnational appeals paneloutcomes

Identifiers

PMID41675921
PMCPMC12886060

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.