Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41676018›Full record

ReviewQuantitative biology (Beijing, China)2024

Deep learning for drug-drug interaction prediction: A comprehensive review.

Xinyue Li, Zhankun Xiong, Wen Zhang, Shichao Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Quantitative biology (Beijing, China), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinyue LiCollege of Informatics Huazhong Agricultural University Wuhan China.
Zhankun XiongCollege of Informatics Huazhong Agricultural University Wuhan China.
Wen ZhangCollege of Informatics Huazhong Agricultural University Wuhan China.
Shichao LiuCollege of Informatics Huazhong Agricultural University Wuhan China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prediction of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is a crucial task for drug safety research, and identifying potential DDIs helps us to explore the mechanism behind combinatorial therapy. Traditional wet chemical experiments for DDI are cumbersome and time-consuming, and are too small in scale, limiting the efficiency of DDI predictions. Therefore, it is particularly crucial to develop improved computational methods for detecting drug interactions. With the development of deep learning, several computational models based on deep learning have been proposed for DDI prediction. In this review, we summarized the high-quality DDI prediction methods based on deep learning in recent years, and divided them into four categories: neural network-based methods, graph neural network-based methods, knowledge graph-based methods, and multimodal-based methods. Furthermore, we discuss the challenges of existing methods and future potential perspectives. This review reveals that deep learning can significantly improve DDI prediction performance compared to traditional machine learning. Deep learning models can scale to large-scale datasets and accept multiple data types as input, thus making DDI predictions more efficient and accurate.

Indexed as

deep learningdrug‐drug interactionsgraph neural networkknowledge graphmultimodal deep learningneural network

Identifiers

PMID41676018
PMCPMC12806424

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.