SynthesisFrontiers in neurology
Summary of the best evidence for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to retrieve, evaluate, and summarize the existing evidence regarding the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with cerebral hemorrhage. The findings will provide a solid foundation for clinical nursing practice. Design: This study presents a comprehensive evidence summary conducted in accordance with the standards set forth by the Evidence-Based Nursing Center at Fudan University. The adherence to these standards ensures the rigor and reliability of the findings presented herein. Methods: Based on the '5S' evidence pyramid model, various evidence-based resources for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients with cerebral hemorrhage were systematically retrieved. These resources include clinical decisions, best practices, guidelines, expert consensus, systematic reviews, and evidence summaries. The search period spans from January 2011 to April 2025. Results: This study included a total of 16 high-quality articles, comprising 2 clinical decisions, 7 guidelines, 4 expert consensuses, 2 systematic reviews, and 1 summary of evidence. In total, 38 pieces of evidence were synthesized across six dimensions: risk assessment, basic prevention, mechanical prevention, pharmacological prevention, nursing documentation, and informed consent. Conclusion: This study summarizes the 38 most compelling pieces of evidence for the prevention of DVT in patients with cerebral hemorrhage, providing an evidence-based foundation for clinical medical staff. It is recommended that healthcare professionals implement these evidence-based practices in clinical settings to effectively reduce the incidence of DVT among patients suffering from cerebral hemorrhage. Systematic review registration: http://ebn.nursing.fudan.edu.cn/registerResources, identifier ES2025786.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.