Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41676284›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2026

Comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopy with flexible ureteroscopy for treating renal pelvis cysts: superior perioperative outcome with a comparable recurrence rate.

Haotong Tang, Hongxiang Zhang, Yin Lei, Chao Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haotong TangDepartment of Urology, First People's Hospital of Shuangliu District Chengdu 610200, Sichuan, China.
Hongxiang ZhangDepartment of Urology, First People's Hospital of Shuangliu District Chengdu 610200, Sichuan, China.
Yin LeiDepartment of Urology, First People's Hospital of Shuangliu District Chengdu 610200, Sichuan, China.
Chao YaoDepartment of Urology, First People's Hospital of Shuangliu District Chengdu 610200, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic excision and drainage for treating renal pelvis pericystic cysts.

methodsA total of 100 patients with renal peripelvic cysts were included and divided into two groups according to surgical method: the Open group (receiving ureteroscopic peripelvic cyst excision and internal drainage) and the Observation group (receiving laparoscopic retroperitoneal peripelvic cyst decompression), with 50 cases in each group. The surgical data of the two groups were compared, including surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, first exhaust time, activity time, length of hospital stay, use of analgesics, renal function indicators, pelvic dilation, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for swelling compression related symptoms (lower back pain), postoperative complications, and cyst recurrence rate.

resultsCompared to the Open group, the Observation group was superior in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, first exhaust time, time of getting out of bed, hospitalization time, and analgesic demand (all

conclusionRetroperitoneal laparoscopic decortication for the treatment of peripelvic cysts significantly improved perioperative outcome and safety, while demonstrating a comparable long-term recurrence rate to flexible ureteroscopic internal drainage.

Indexed as

curative effectparapelvic cyst decorticationrecurrenceRenal peripelvic cystsretroperitoneal laparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID41676284
PMCPMC12886108

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.