ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2025
Smartphone addiction as a risk factor for medication non-adherence in renal transplant recipients.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Medication non-adherence (MNA) is a leading cause of graft loss and mortality in renal transplant recipients. Smartphone addiction (SPA) is associated with cognitive impairment and poor time management, but its relationship with MNA remains unclear. This is the first study to investigate the association between SPA and MNA in renal transplant recipients. Material and methods: This cross-sectional study included 140 renal transplant recipients. SPA was assessed using the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV) and weekly screen time. MNA was measured using the Immunosuppressant Therapy Adherence Scale (ITAS), classifying adherence as perfect (12), acceptable (10-11), or poor (≤ 9). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify predictors of MNA. Results: Patients with poor adherence had longer weekly screen time (27 ±10 h) than those with perfect (20 ±10 h) or acceptable adherence (21 ±11 h) ( Conclusions: Excessive smartphone use, particularly prolonged screen time, is independently associated with MNA in renal transplant recipients. Integrating screen time tracking into routine transplant care may help identify at-risk patients. Future studies should determine whether reducing screen exposure improves adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.