ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Chromatin architecture and physical constriction cooperate in phenotype switching and cancer cell dissemination.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phenotypic plasticity is a prominent cancer feature that contributes to metastatic potential and resistance to therapy across multiple cancer types. Cancer cell state transitions have been attributed to transcriptional programs, such as the AP1/TEAD-regulated gene network driving the mesenchymal-like (MES) phenotype. In addition, during dissemination, tumor cells are subjected to variable loads of physical mechanical pressure and constriction across transited tissue, which are thought to impact nuclear molecular crowding. How the interplay between mechanical pressure, global 3D nuclear architecture and transcriptional programs contributes to MES identity and metastatic adaptation remains unclear. Using cutaneous melanoma as a model for early dissemination, we integrate in vitro and in vivo epigenomic profiling with nanoscale imaging of cell lines and patient samples to investigate chromatin organization features underlying the MES phenotype. We find that in MES cells, CTCF is relocated from domain boundaries to regulatory regions of EMT-like genes, leading to reduced insulation, extended topological associated domains (TADs) and increased inter-domain contacts, and de novo formation of chromatin hubs. This conformational rewiring, along with loss of heterochromatin, supports nuclear deformability during invasion and dissemination. Conversely, physical constriction of melanocytic cells induces MES-like chromatin features -including CTCF repositioning and heterochromatin loss- and promotes metastasis in vivo. Similarly, pharmacological inhibition of the heterochromatin mark H3K9me3 triggers MES characteristics and increases invasiveness. These results demonstrate that metastatic competency involves both epigenetic and structural nuclear reprogramming, enabling shifts in gene networks and physical adaptability. Our findings reveal mechanistic links between nuclear architecture and aggressive tumor behavior, identifying potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets to intercept metastatic progression.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.