ArticleJMA journal2026
Online Genetic Counseling as a Solution for Unmet Needs in Genetic Medicine: The First Survey in Japan.
Article in JMA journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Potential and Challenges of Online Genetic Counseling in Japan.JMA journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The demand for genetic counseling is increasing in Japan owing to rapid advancements in genetic medicine and increased utilization of genetic testing. However, access to genetic counseling remains limited, particularly in rural areas, owing to a shortage of certified professionals. Online genetic counseling (OGC), a form of telemedicine, offers a potential solution to address these disparities. Although OGC is widely practiced in Western countries, its implementation and systemic evaluation in Japan remain limited. To our knowledge, this study represents the first attempt in Japan to systematically assess the effectiveness, challenges, and user satisfaction of OGC compared with in-person genetic counseling (IPGC) in the context of the Japanese health care system. Methods: This cross-sectional, single-center study involved 49 participants (15 OGC, 34 IPGC) who received genetic counseling at the NHO Tokyo Medical Center between July 2020 and January 2025. Participants completed anonymous questionnaires assessing demographic characteristics, satisfaction with counseling, and perceived advantages and disadvantages. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, and Fisher's exact tests. Free-text responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis and word cloud visualization. Results: Overall satisfaction was high in both groups, with all participants selecting "Strongly agree" or "Agree" regarding satisfaction. However, the IPGC group scored significantly higher in counselor introduction, responsiveness, and overall satisfaction. OGC participants had significantly longer travel times and were more likely to be in their 20s-30s. Key advantages of OGC included convenience and accessibility, whereas disadvantages included concerns about privacy and technical issues. Conclusions: OGC has high potential to improve access to genetic services in Japan, particularly for individuals in remote areas. Despite high satisfaction, challenges such as communication limitations, privacy concerns, and lack of insurance coverage must be addressed. Policy reforms, improved infrastructure, and further large-scale studies are needed to support the widespread implementation of OGC in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.