Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41677448›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2026

Socioeconomic Factors Associated With Diet Quality in Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Australian Study.

Bree Whiteoak, Danielle Gallegos, Severine Navarro, Leonie Callaway, Susan de Jersey, Victoria Eley, Alka Kothari, Samantha L Dawson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bree WhiteoakSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-6737-0002
Danielle GallegosSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5901-1909
Severine NavarroCentre for Childhood Nutrition Research, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4568-9721
Leonie CallawayFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0137-9935
Susan de JerseyDepartment of Dietetics and Foodservices, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6321-8558
Victoria EleyFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6715-9193
Alka KothariFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9816-3734
Samantha L DawsonIMPACT - the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Food & Mood Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4701-1220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prenatal diet affects maternal and child health; however, adherence to dietary guidelines in pregnancy is low. This cross-sectional study aimed to describe overall diet quality and to examine relationships between socioeconomic factors and diet quality in a sample of Australian pregnant women. Participants (n = 1580) completed an online survey and self-reported usual dietary intake (via a food frequency questionnaire [FFQ]) and socioeconomic factors, including highest educational attainment, income, perception of overall financial situation, residential postcode for area-level socioeconomic status (SES), stressful life events, and perceived social support. FFQ responses were converted to an overall diet quality score using the Dietary Guidelines Index 2013 (DGI-13) criteria. Latent class analysis was used to identify groups of stressful life events, and multiple linear regression models examined associations between the socioeconomic factors and DGI-13 score. Overall, adherence to dietary guidelines and prenatal diet quality were low. The mean DGI-13 score was 76.1 (SD 13.7) out of a maximum possible score of 130. All socioeconomic factors were significantly associated with DGI-13 score. For all socioeconomic factors except the perceived social support score, the lowest/most disadvantaged categories and middle/medium categories were associated with clinically important reductions of 5-9 points and 3-6 points, respectively, indicating a social gradient in diet quality. There is a need to improve prenatal diet quality among all women. However, there is an urgent need for systems-level interventions and policy change that target those with lower SES backgrounds to reduce dietary and health inequities.

Indexed as

DietSocioeconomic FactorsAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLow Socioeconomic StatusNutrition PolicyPregnancySocial SupportSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultdietdietary patternslow socioeconomic statuspregnancysocial classsocioeconomic disparities in healthsocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID41677448
PMCPMC12896378

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.