ReviewCells2026
Decoding Glioblastoma Through Liquid Biopsy: Molecular Insights and Clinical Prospects.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiogenomic landscape of the hallmarks of cancer.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Biomarkers for predicting immunotherapy response and resistance in glioblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Glioma-derived extracellular vesicles as drivers of immunotherapeutic resistance: mechanisms of immune reprogramming and metabolic intervention.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liquid biopsy (LB) offers a minimally invasive approach to characterizing and monitoring glioblastoma (GB), a tumor marked by extensive heterogeneity, limited surgical accessibility and rapid molecular evolution. By analyzing circulating tumor-derived components such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), extracellular vesicles (EVs), circulating RNA species and circulating tumor cells (CTC), LB provides dynamic molecular information that cannot be captured by neuroimaging or single-site tissue sampling. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) currently yields the highest sensitivity for detecting tumor-specific alterations, while plasma enables repeat monitoring despite lower biomarker abundance. EVs have gained particular prominence due to their ability to preserve DNA, RNA, and protein cargo that reflects key genomic changes, treatment resistance mechanisms, and immune evasion. Although advances are substantial, clinical implementation remains constrained by low analyte concentrations, methodological variability, limited standardization and the high cost of testing, which is rarely reimbursed by insurers. This review summarizes current evidence on circulating biomarkers in GB and highlights research priorities essential for integrating LB into future diagnostic and therapeutic workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.