ReviewPediatric radiology2026
Foundation models in radiology: a primer for pediatric radiologists.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foundation models (FMs) are large deep learning models pre-trained on vast heterogeneous datasets through self-supervised learning that are adaptable to diverse downstream tasks with minimal fine-tuning. In pediatric radiology, where data scarcity, rare pathologies, and anatomical variability present significant hurdles, FMs offer a robust mechanism for broad feature learning. Complementary to traditional machine learning pipelines, FMs serve as flexible backbones that can be adapted to specific clinical needs through established techniques such as transfer learning and parameter-efficient fine-tuning. These models can facilitate multiple tasks, such as pathology detection and classification, lesion segmentation, report generation, and visual question answering, with the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, workflow efficiency, and decision support in pediatric care. However, FMs' implementation in pediatric imaging faces key challenges, including pediatric unique disease spectra and anatomical variability, limited datasets, ethical and privacy issues, and the absence of pediatric-specific validation. Broader limitations include hallucinations, lack of model explainability, resource disparities, and risks of radiologists' deskilling. Future perspectives to overcome these barriers are represented by techniques such as federated and continual learning, and synthetic data generation. Our review introduces the principles and architectures of FMs, presents the current and emerging applications in pediatric radiology, and offers an overview of the challenges and future directions for FMs' safe, equitable, and effective integration into clinical practice. FMs are a promising frontier for transforming pediatric imaging and advancing child-centered healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41677830What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.