ArticleHerz2026
[Sudden cardiac death in structural heart disease : Update on prevention].
Article in Herz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains one of the leading causes of death despite major advances in cardiovascular diagnostics and treatment. Evidence supporting primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation is still derived from trials conducted more than two decades ago and no longer reflects contemporary clinical practice. Modern heart failure treatment, improved coronary artery disease (CAD) management and refined prevention strategies have substantially reduced the risk of SCD and question the role of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as the primary selection criterion. Recent studies further demonstrated that a universal survival benefit due to an ICD is absent in several patient groups previously considered to have a high risk. Current developments emphasize individualized risk stratification incorporating the overall risk, imaging-based markers such as scar architecture on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), genetic variants, modifiable therapeutic factors and electrocardiographic parameters. In addition, artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches offer new opportunities for risk prediction in both high-risk populations and the general population. Ongoing trials, such as PROFID-EHRA and CONTEMP-ICD are expected to fundamentally reshape the risk stratification and guideline recommendations. Until then, decisions regarding ICD implantation remain an interdisciplinary challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41677836What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.