Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41677895›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2026

Development of biocontrol agents for cotton verticillium wilt using microbiome analysis.

Wanyi Zhang, Jingjing Wang, Peng Wu, Yan Pang, Shijia Dai, Xiaoxia Zhang, Shiwu Xu, Bo Gao, Ying Chen, Zhiyong Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wanyi Zhang *Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, 300308, China.
Jingjing Wang *Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, 300308, China. wang_jj@tib.cas.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8147-8441
Peng WuTianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, 300308, China.
Yan PangTianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, 300308, China.
Shijia DaiTianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, 300308, China.
Xiaoxia ZhangTianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, 300308, China.
Shiwu XuXinjiang Production and Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology and Pesticide-Fertilizer Innovation, 862003, Shihezi, China.
Bo GaoXinjiang Production and Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology and Pesticide-Fertilizer Innovation, 862003, Shihezi, China.
Ying ChenXinjiang Production and Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology and Pesticide-Fertilizer Innovation, 862003, Shihezi, China.
Zhiyong HuangTianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, 300308, China. huang_zy@tib.cas.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Verticillium wilt is one of the most devastating diseases of cotton, yet effective biocontrol strains remain scarce. This study aimed to guide the selection of efficient biocontrol strains by comparing the microbiomes of healthy and diseased cotton plants. Our results revealed that Verticillium dahliae V991 (V991) significantly altered the bacterial and fungal communities in the cotton roots, rhizosphere soil and bulk soil. Compared to diseased cotton in the V991 inoculation group (D), both healthy cotton in the V991 inoculation group (H) and non-inoculated control cotton (C) suppressed Verticillium and Fusarium and enriched Bacilli, Clostridia, Archacosporales, Glomerales, unclassified Basidiomycota and unclassified Glomeromycota in the roots, enriched Burkholderiales in the rhizosphere soil, enriched Archaeosporales and Verrucomicrobiota in the bulk soil. A total of 20 strains with antagonism against V991 were screened, most isolated from roots of the C group. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens M9 (BM), isolated from rhizosphere soil, exhibited the strongest antifungal activity, while Bacillus cereus R19 (BR), isolated from root, showed weaker activity. Pot experiments demonstrated that application of BR and BM (10

Indexed as

Biological Control AgentsGossypiumMicrobiotaPlant DiseasesVerticilliumAntibiosisBacteriaFungiPlant RootsRhizosphereSoil MicrobiologyBiological Control AgentsAntifungal activityBiocontrol bacteriaCottonMicrobial communitiesVerticillium wilt

Identifiers

PMID41677895

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.