ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026
Adaptation of an arterial spin labeling sequence for the assessment of brain perfusion on a 0.35 T MR-Linac.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05565326 (Pilot Study on Response Assessment During MR-guided Radiation Therapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pilot Study on Response Assessment During MR-guided Radiation Therapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHybrid MR-Linac devices allow the acquisition of functional MR images during a regular radiotherapy treatment workflow, which could improve target delineation and response assessment. In this work, we investigate the feasibility of acquiring arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion images on a 0.35 T MR-Linac. MATERIALS AND
methodsA signal model for the flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) ASL sequence was introduced and an optimized set of sequence parameters for 0.35 T was determined. The signal dependence on the sequence parameters using the MR-Linac was examined in the brain of two healthy volunteers. Repeatability of cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements with an adjusted MR-Linac protocol were compared to ASL images from a clinical 3 T scanner in six healthy volunteers that were scanned twice on each device.
resultsThe signal model described the observed measurements well, except for the dependence on inversion time. CBF values in gray and white matter in the six volunteers were systematically higher than at the 3 T scanner, but they had a similar percentage repeatability coefficient of 16-17%.
conclusionAn adjusted 10-min FAIR bSSFP ASL protocol on a 0.35 T MR-Linac yielded repeatable CBF measurements. (glinicaltrials.gov NCT05565326, submitted 2022-09-29).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41678045What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.