Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41680439›Full record

ArticleNature biomedical engineering2026

Generalist foundation models from a multimodal dataset for 3D computed tomography.

Ibrahim Ethem Hamamci, Sezgin Er, Chenyu Wang, Furkan Almas, Ayse Gulnihan Simsek, Sevval Nil Esirgun, Irem Dogan, Omer Faruk Durugol, Benjamin Hou, Suprosanna Shit and 20 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Why Only 3D for 3D? 2D-Guided Supervision for 3D Medical Vision-Language Models.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical Metadata-Guided Limited-Angle CT Image Reconstruction.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. OpenVocabCT: Toward Universal Text-Driven CT Image Segmentation.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Ibrahim Ethem Hamamci *Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. ibrahim.hamamci@uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2932-3105
Sezgin Er *Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7266-9844
Chenyu WangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Furkan AlmasInternational School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2931-1654
Ayse Gulnihan SimsekInternational School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sevval Nil EsirgunInternational School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Irem DoganInternational School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Omer Faruk DurugolInternational School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4489-0556
Benjamin HouDivision of Intramural Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Suprosanna ShitDepartment of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4435-7207
Weicheng DaiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Murong XuDepartment of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4220-4403
Hadrien ReynaudDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0261-2660
Muhammed Furkan DasdelenInternational School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2251-2093
Bastian WittmannDepartment of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-2926
Tamaz AmiranashviliDepartment of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8914-3427
Enis SimsarDepartment of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mehmet SimsarInternational School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Emine Bensu ErdemirInternational School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abdullah AlanbayInternational School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Anjany SekuboyinaDepartment of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Berkan LafciDepartment of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ahmet KaplanInternational School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Zhiyong LuDivision of Intramural Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9998-916X
Malgorzata PolacinInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bernhard KainzDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7813-5023
Christian BluethgenInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7321-5676
Kayhan BatmanghelichDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9893-9136
Mehmet Kemal OzdemirInternational School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bjoern MenzeDepartment of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4136-5690

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in medical imaging AI, particularly in 3D imaging, have been limited due to the scarcity of comprehensive datasets. We introduce CT-RATE, a public dataset that pairs 3D medical images with corresponding textual reports. CT-RATE comprises 25,692 non-contrast 3D chest CT scans from 21,304 unique patients. Each scan is accompanied by its corresponding radiology report. Leveraging CT-RATE, we develop CT-CLIP, a CT-focused contrastive language-image pretraining framework designed for broad applications without the need for task-specific training. We demonstrate how CT-CLIP can be used in multi-abnormality detection and case retrieval, and outperforms state-of-the-art fully supervised models across all key metrics. By combining CT-CLIP's vision encoder with a pretrained large language model, we create CT-CHAT, a vision-language foundational chat model for 3D chest CT volumes. Fine-tuned on over 2.7 million question-answer pairs derived from the CT-RATE dataset, CT-CHAT underscores the necessity for specialized methods in 3D medical imaging. Collectively, the open-source release of CT-RATE, CT-CLIP and CT-CHAT not only addresses critical challenges in 3D medical imaging but also lays the groundwork for future innovations in medical AI and improved patient care.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualHumansLarge Language Models

Identifiers

PMID41680439

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.