ReviewImmunologic research2026
Innate lymphoid cells: unsung heroes or villains in multiple sclerosis pathogenesis?
Review in Immunologic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep phenotyping ILCs and T cells: A comparative analysis protocol for conventional and spectral flow cytometry.STAR protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The emerging role of Innate Lymphoid Cells (ILCs) in the pathogenesis and regulation of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), a complex neuroinflammatory autoimmune disease, has been increasingly recognized. Once identified only for activities conducted at barrier surfaces, ILCs are now understood to be important modulators of inflammation and tissue repair within the Central Nervous System (CNS). This review aims to elucidate the 'two sides of the coin' nature of ILCs in MS. ILCs are implicated in pathogenesis by driving neuroinflammation through pro-inflammatory cytokines, contributing to the formation of ectopic meningeal lymphoid follicles, and modulating meningeal immune system interactions. In contrast, certain ILC subsets confer protective effects by secreting anti-inflammatory cytokines and promoting tissue homeostasis. Recent experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated the complex balance and alteration of ILC responsiveness at various stages of MS. We focused on the importance of ILC subset determination, including their dependence on key cytokine signaling pathways and their critical role in the gut-CNS axis, a pivotal mediator of systemic immunity in MS. Moreover, the potential for ILC pathway targeting, either by modulating cytokine networks or modifying the microbiota, is discussed as a promising avenue for restoring immune balance, promoting neuroprotection and suppressing ILC-driven inflammation. Despite the challenges presented by ILC plasticity and diversity, elucidating ILC biology offers a clear path toward developing precise immunomodulatory strategies aimed at halting disease progression and promoting CNS repair in patients with MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41680537What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.