Evidence mapPaperPMID 41680696Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Change of maternal weight gain trajectory following lifestyle interventions for gestational diabetes and its impact on abnormal infant birthweight: an observational study based on longitudinal weight measurements.

Juan Li, Chuanzi Yang, Kuanrong Li

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juan Li *Clinical Epidemiology Group, Department of Clinical Research, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 9 Jinsui Road, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
Chuanzi Yang *Clinical Epidemiology Group, Department of Clinical Research, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 9 Jinsui Road, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
Kuanrong LiClinical Epidemiology Group, Department of Clinical Research, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 9 Jinsui Road, Guangzhou, 510623, China. lik@gwcmc.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRestricted gestational weight gain (GWG) following lifestyle interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has been observed in clinical trials but not been explicitly confirmed in real-world clinical settings. Furthermore, how such a restricted GWG affects adverse birthweight outcomes, i.e. infants born large/small for gestational age (LGA/SGA), remains unclear.

methodIn this retrospective study, based on longitudinal weight measurements from 33,515 Chinese women, including 5,932 with GDM diagnosed by 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), we compared the adjusted GWG trajectories of women with and without GDM. We estimated weekly GWG before and after OGTT (WGWGpre−OGTT and WGWGpost−OGTT) and calculated ΔWGWG as WGWGpre−OGTT minus WGWGpost−OGTT. We then estimated the adjusted relative risks (aRR) of LGA and SGA for restricted vs. unrestricted WGWGpost−OGTT (ΔWGWG > 0 vs. ≤0 kg) among women with GDM. The analyses were stratified by prepregnancy body mass index (pBMI).

resultsThere was a marked decrease between the mean estimated WGWGpre−OGTT (0.50 kg) and WGWGpost−OGTT (0.36 kg) in women with GDM, in contrast to a negligible decrease from 0.52 to 0.51 kg in women without GDM. Using 14–19 gestational weeks as the baseline, the cumulative GWG since the baseline became statistically significantly less in women with than without GDM after the initiation of lifestyle interventions, regardless of their pBMI category. Women with an underweight, normal-weight, and overweight/obese pBMI gained by an adjusted median of 1.84 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.50, 2.17], 2.53 (2.38, 2.68), and 2.99 kg (2.63, 3.35) less, respectively, than their non-GDM counterparts by the end of gestation (38–39 weeks). Among women with GDM, a restricted WGWGpost−OGTT showed no association with either LGA or SGA for underweight pBMI, a null association with SGA but a statistically significant association with a reduced risk of LGA for normal-weight pBMI [aRR (95% CI): 1.02 (0.82, 1.28) and 0.62 (0.49, 0.79), respectively], and opposite although non-significant associations for overweight/obese pBMI [ aRR (95% CI): 1.22 (0.66, 2.28) for SGA and 0.74 (0.52, 1.06) for LGA].

conclusionsLifestyle interventions for GDM are likely to cause a substantially restricted GWG, which however might only have a fully beneficial effect on infant birthweight for women with a normal-weight pBMI.

Indexed as

Birth WeightBody-Weight TrajectoryDiabetes, GestationalGestational Weight GainLife StyleWeight GainAdultBody Mass IndexChinaFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansInfant, Large for Gestational AgeInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeLongitudinal StudiesCohort studyGestational diabetes mellitusGestational weight gainLarge for gestational ageSmall for gestational age

Identifiers

PMID41680696
PMCPMC13036951

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.