Evidence mapPaperPMID 41680778Full record

ReviewMolecular cancer2026

AI-driven nanomedicine for cancer theranostics.

Ashutosh Tiwari, Widodo, Dyah Ika Krisnawati, Chih-Yu Chen, Tsung-Rong Kuo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Iron-Based Nanoparticles as Delivery Tools.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ashutosh TiwariInternational Ph.D. Program in Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan.
WidodoInstitut Teknologi Al-Mahrusiyah, Kediri, 64112, East Java, Indonesia.
Dyah Ika KrisnawatiDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Surabaya, 60237, Indonesia.
Chih-Yu ChenInternational Ph.D. Program in Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan. aleckc2424@tmu.edu.tw.
Tsung-Rong KuoInternational Ph.D. Program in Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan. trkuo@tmu.edu.tw.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council NSTC 113-2113-M-038-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomedicine's merging with artificial intelligence (AI) is fundamentally changing cancer theranostics through precise creation of multifunctional nanoparticles which can simultaneously diagnose and treat diseases. Traditional cancer treatments today face issues with imprecise delivery and general body toxicity as well as late-stage disease recognition which theranostic nanoplatforms address through precision drug transport and live imaging functions. In this analysis, we examine the existing state and forthcoming developments of AI applications in cancer theranostics through nanoparticles. Our study first examines the three primary classes of theranostic nanomaterials that show clinical significance: liposomes, gold nanoparticles, iron oxide nanoparticles, and quantum dots. AI is being applied to nanoparticle development through machine learning, deep learning, reinforcement learning, and generative models that support physicochemical predictions, synthesis optimization, biodistribution modeling, and inverse design. We analyze clinical applications of AI solutions which support patient identification, response predictions, and implementation of virtual patient models for individualized cancer treatment. The paper evaluates major difficulties which are nanotoxicity, AI explainability, data limitations, and regulatory concerns while addressing ethical dilemmas. Rather than a broad overview of nanomedicine, we center on AI methods that directly improve theranostic decisions and support this with worked exemplars reporting datasets, baselines, metrics, and clinical tie-ins. This Task–Data–Method–Metric lens replaces generic background and grounds claims in reproducible evidence.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNanomedicineNeoplasmsTheranostic NanomedicineAnimalsGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansNanoparticlesPrecision MedicineAI-driven nanomedicineCancer theranosticsInverse designNanotoxicityPrecision oncologySmart nanoparticle

Identifiers

PMID41680778
PMCPMC13005573

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.