ReviewMolecular cancer2026
AI-driven nanomedicine for cancer theranostics.
Review in Molecular cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle-Based Biomaterials in Cancer Research: From Mechanistic Insights to Therapeutic Innovation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Polymer Nanoparticles in Medical Applications-Future Directions.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Iron-Based Nanoparticles as Delivery Tools.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Preclinical Advances in Functionalized Nanozymes for Periodontitis: From Antibacterial Action to Tissue Regeneration.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Nanomedicine for Targeted Phototherapy in Head and Neck Cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanomedicine's merging with artificial intelligence (AI) is fundamentally changing cancer theranostics through precise creation of multifunctional nanoparticles which can simultaneously diagnose and treat diseases. Traditional cancer treatments today face issues with imprecise delivery and general body toxicity as well as late-stage disease recognition which theranostic nanoplatforms address through precision drug transport and live imaging functions. In this analysis, we examine the existing state and forthcoming developments of AI applications in cancer theranostics through nanoparticles. Our study first examines the three primary classes of theranostic nanomaterials that show clinical significance: liposomes, gold nanoparticles, iron oxide nanoparticles, and quantum dots. AI is being applied to nanoparticle development through machine learning, deep learning, reinforcement learning, and generative models that support physicochemical predictions, synthesis optimization, biodistribution modeling, and inverse design. We analyze clinical applications of AI solutions which support patient identification, response predictions, and implementation of virtual patient models for individualized cancer treatment. The paper evaluates major difficulties which are nanotoxicity, AI explainability, data limitations, and regulatory concerns while addressing ethical dilemmas. Rather than a broad overview of nanomedicine, we center on AI methods that directly improve theranostic decisions and support this with worked exemplars reporting datasets, baselines, metrics, and clinical tie-ins. This Task–Data–Method–Metric lens replaces generic background and grounds claims in reproducible evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.