ArticleSystematic reviews2026
Efficacy of sivelestat sodium for patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute lung injury (ALI) are life-threatening conditions with limited effective pharmacological interventions. Sivelestat sodium, a selective neutrophil elastase inhibitor, has been extensively investigated in ARDS/ALI treatment due to its significant anti-inflammatory properties; however, its therapeutic efficacy remains controversial. As a drug developed and first approved in Japan, most previous meta-analyses have failed to incorporate Japanese literature, potentially introducing substantial language bias. Additionally, Japanese clinical practices may employ different treatment protocols that could offer novel perspectives on sivelestat sodium's application. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate sivelestat sodium's efficacy in ARDS/ALI patients by simultaneously including both English and Japanese clinical literature.
methodsWe will systematically search English databases (Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed) and Japanese databases (Ichushi Web, J-STAGE) for randomized controlled trials comparing sivelestat sodium with placebo or standard therapy in adult ARDS/ALI patients. Two independent reviewers will screen studies, extract data, and assess risk of bias. Primary outcomes include duration of mechanical ventilation and all-cause mortality (28-30 days, ICU, and in-hospital). If sufficient eligible studies are identified, a random-effects model will be employed for meta-analysis. Between-study heterogeneity will be assessed using the I DISCUSSION: This protocol outlines a systematic approach for evaluating sivelestat sodium's efficacy in ARDS/ALI through the integration of English and Japanese literature. Methodological rigor will ensure high-quality evidence synthesis despite challenges in integrating diverse studies. This research addresses a significant gap, as meta-analyses incorporating Japanese publications have been absent for over a decade. The findings will provide evidence-based guidance for clinical practice, inform individualized treatment strategies, optimize sivelestat administration protocols, and identify directions for future research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420251067146.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.