ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026
Embedding public and patient involvement in childhood stuttering research: lessons learned from engaging children and families in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPublic and Patient Involvement (PPI) is increasingly recognised as essential for ensuring health research is relevant, inclusive, and responsive to local contexts. However, in many regions of the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia, PPI remains underdeveloped. This commentary presents a reflective account of how PPI was embedded throughout a multi-method doctoral study exploring the experiences of Saudi children who stutter (CWS). MAIN BODY: This paper describes how ten Arabic-speaking contributors, including three children (aged 8 to10 years), two parents, two teachers, and three speech and language therapists, participated across six phases of the doctoral research: 1)planning, 2) recruitment, 3) pre-data collection, 4) data collection, 5) dissemination, and 6) early implementation. The contributors helped shape child-friendly, culturally relevant materials and advised on the linguistic accessibility and emotional safety of proposed recruitment and data collection tools and procedures. While CWS were not involved in the PPI group due to recruitment challenges, children with speech-sound disorders contributed insights to inform the design of child-centred tools. Their input influenced recruitment strategies, task sequencing during data collection, and dissemination formats. Key challenges included limited awareness of PPI among contributors, difficulty recruiting children who stutter, and the need to distinguish between research participants and PPI advisors for the contributors. Creative engagement methods, such as role-play and WhatsApp-based consultations, helped support inclusion and build trust.
conclusionThis commentary presents one of the first documented examples of child-inclusive PPI in the Saudi context, highlighting the value of cross-generational collaboration and culturally responsive methods in enhancing research relevance and accessibility. We advocate for greater awareness, infrastructure, and policy support to embed meaningful PPI across the region, with particular attention to the cultural and linguistic dimensions of PPI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.