Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41681409›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

The Role of Olfaction in Dogs: Evolution, Biology, and Human-Oriented Work.

Iwona Kowalczyk-Jabłońska, Paulina Jundziłł-Bogusiewicz, Tadeusz Kaleta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Iwona Kowalczyk-JabłońskaDepartment of Animal Genetics and Conservation, Institute of Animal Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 8 Ciszewskiego Str., 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0009-0007-2349-6060
Paulina Jundziłł-BogusiewiczDepartment of Animal Genetics and Conservation, Institute of Animal Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 8 Ciszewskiego Str., 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3077-3042
Tadeusz KaletaDepartment of Animal Genetics and Conservation, Institute of Animal Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 8 Ciszewskiego Str., 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

Institute of Animal Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW The publication was financed by Institute of Animal Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dogs show exceptional olfactory sensitivity and are widely used in medical, rescue, military, and forensic applications, yet the determinants of individual and breed-level scent-work performance remain incompletely characterized. This review integrates evidence from the anatomy and physiology of the canine olfactory organ, neurobiological mechanisms of odor transduction and coding, and links between olfaction, memory, and emotion, alongside molecular genetics, evolution, domestication, and selective breeding. We synthesize findings indicating that complex nasal turbinates and specialized airflow patterns enhance odorant capture, while olfactory bulb circuitry and downstream connections to limbic and frontal networks support discrimination, learning, and affective modulation. Comparative and breed-focused studies suggest that skull morphology and breeding priorities can alter olfactory capacity, with shortened nasal anatomy associated with reduced functional potential in some lines. In applied contexts, detection success is strongly shaped by behavioral traits such as motivation, persistence, independence, and reward value, as well as by physical condition and environmental stressors that can impair search efficiency. Emerging literature further suggests that the gastrointestinal and upper airway microbiome, together with diet, housing, temperature, and workload, may influence sensory and cognitive readiness, although direct causal links to detection outcomes remain limited. Overall, canine olfactory performance reflects interactions among genetic-anatomical capacity, neurobehavioral factors, and environment, underscoring the value of standardized selection, training, welfare management, and future integrative research.

Indexed as

behavioral predispositionscanine olfactiondetection dog performancedomestication effectsmicrobiome and olfactionolfactory anatomyolfactory neurobiologyscent detection dogsselective breedingworking dogs

Identifiers

PMID41681409
PMCPMC12897092

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.