ReviewCancers2026
Biliary Drainage During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer: Evidence and Practical Recommendations.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer frequently presents with obstructive jaundice resulting from distal malignant biliary obstruction. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly applied in resectable and borderline resectable disease. In this context, uncontrolled cholestasis or cholangitis may hinder timely chemotherapy initiation and cause unplanned hospitalizations and treatment delays; therefore, preoperative biliary drainage is essential to ensure safe and uninterrupted NAC. This review summarizes current biliary drainage strategies during NAC, focusing on key clinical goals, maintaining durable patency throughout the planned NAC course, minimizing infectious and procedure-related morbidity, reducing the need for reintervention, and avoiding adverse effects on subsequent pancreatoduodenectomy, as well as on practical decision-making in clinical practice. We compare transpapillary drainage via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using plastic stents and self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) and discuss the emerging "slim" fully covered SEMSs designed to reduce the risks of pancreatitis and cholecystitis while maintaining sufficient patency. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage is also reviewed as an important salvage option after failed ERCP and as a potential primary approach in selected patients, and we also discuss conventional percutaneous approaches. Overall, current evidence supports an individualized, algorithm-based strategy that prioritizes durable internal drainage to maintain NAC schedules, reserves percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for specific indications, and underscores the need for further prospective studies evaluating long-term surgical and oncologic outcomes in resectable disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.