Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41681963›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

MRI-Based Radiomics for Non-Invasive Prediction of Molecular Biomarkers in Gliomas.

Edoardo Agosti, Karen Mapelli, Gianluca Grimod, Amedeo Piazza, Marco Maria Fontanella, Pier Paolo Panciani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edoardo AgostiDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6463-5000
Karen MapelliDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-5957-8689
Gianluca GrimodNeurosurgery Unit, IRCCS San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Amedeo PiazzaDepartment of Neurosurgery, "Sapienza" University, 49911 Rome, Italy.
Marco Maria FontanellaDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4023-1909
Pier Paolo PancianiDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9891-936X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiomics has emerged as a promising approach to non-invasively characterize the molecular landscape of gliomas, providing quantitative, high-dimensional data derived from routine MRI. Given the recent shift toward molecularly driven classification, radiomics may support precision oncology by predicting key genomic, epigenetic, and phenotypic alterations without the need for invasive tissue sampling. This systematic review aimed to synthesize current radiomics applications for the non-invasive prediction of molecular biomarkers in gliomas, evaluating methodological trends, performance metrics, and translational readiness.

methodsThis review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus on 10 January 2025, and updated on 1 February 2025, using predefined MeSH terms and keywords related to glioma, radiomics, machine learning, deep learning, and molecular biomarkers. Eligible studies included original research using MRI-based radiomics to predict molecular alterations in human gliomas, with reported performance metrics. Data extraction covered study design, cohort size, MRI sequences, segmentation approaches, feature extraction software, computational methods, biomarkers assessed, and diagnostic performance. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS), Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI) criteria, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Due to heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was performed.

resultsOf 744 screened records, 70 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 10,324 patients were included across all studies (mean 140 patients/study, range 23-628). The most frequently employed MRI sequences were T2-weighted (59 studies, 84.3%), contrast-enhanced T1WI (53 studies, 75.7%), T1WI (50 studies, 71.4%), and FLAIR (48 studies, 68.6%); diffusion-weighted imaging was used in only 7 studies (12.8%). Manual segmentation predominated (52 studies, 74.3%), whereas automated approaches were used in 13 studies (18.6%). Common feature extraction platforms included 3D Slicer (20 studies, 28.6%) and MATLAB-based tools (17 studies, 24.3%). Machine learning methods were applied in 47 studies (67.1%), with support vector machines used in 29 studies (41.4%); deep learning models were implemented in 27 studies (38.6%), primarily convolutional neural networks (20 studies, 28.6%). IDH mutation was the most frequently predicted biomarker (49 studies, 70%), followed by ATRX (27 studies, 38.6%), MGMT methylation (8 studies, 11,4%), and 1p/19q codeletion (7 studies, 10%). Reported AUC values ranged from 0.80 to 0.99 for IDH, approximately 0.71-0.953 for 1p/19q, 0.72-0.93 for MGMT, and 0.76-0.97 for ATRX, with deep learning or hybrid pipelines generally achieving the highest performance. RQS values highlighted substantial methodological variability, and IBSI adherence was inconsistent. NOS scores indicated high-quality methodology in a limited subset of studies.

conclusionsRadiomics demonstrates strong potential for the non-invasive prediction of key glioma molecular biomarkers, achieving high diagnostic performance across diverse computational approaches. However, widespread clinical translation remains hindered by heterogeneous imaging protocols, limited standardization, insufficient external validation, and variable methodological rigor.

Indexed as

deep learninggliomamachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingmolecular biologyradiomicssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41681963
PMCPMC12897266

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.