Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41682232›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Modifiable and Non-Modifiable Predictors of Exercise Capacity in Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review.

Klaske van Kammen, Lotte A J Verkuijlen, Ana B Nasser, Rienk Dekker, Leonie A Krops, Bregje L Seves

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Klaske van KammenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6625-8018
Lotte A J VerkuijlenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-9084-5019
Ana B NasserDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-1168-610X
Rienk DekkerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6649-6289
Leonie A KropsDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1721-3953
Bregje L SevesDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4066-1893

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis systematic review aims to identify modifiable and non-modifiable predictors of exercise capacity (VO

methodsPubMed (PubMed.gov), EMBASE (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Web of Science (Clarivate) were searched (last search on 7 October 2025). Inclusion criteria were: (1) adults (>18 years) who survived a stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic), (2) outcome was a measurement of maximum exercise capacity (VO

resultsOf 919 unique articles, seventeen were included. Modifiable factors such as BMI (4/8 articles) and fat mass (1/1), lower limb strength (3/3), cardiorespiratory fitness (e.g., baseline VO

conclusionsThis systematic review highlights the significant role of modifiable and non-modifiable predictors in optimizing exercise capacity (VO

Indexed as

body compositioncardiorespiratory fitnessfatiguelower limb strengthpersonalized carerehabilitation treatmentstrokesystematic reviewtraining intensityVO2peak

Identifiers

PMID41682232
PMCPMC12897659

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.